[The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.
This quote from the 1905 dissent to the Lochner v. New York decision tells us that

Question 1 options:

A. the Constitution exists to put forth a single view of good governance.
B. the divisions among people will be solved by the Constitution.
C. whether a view is familiar or shocking does not determine if it is constitutional.
D. the Constitution contains nothing shocking.